International Journal of Emerging Trends in Management
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Emerging Trends in Management
Original reseach article

From Interaction to Sustainability: An Exploratory Study of Serbian Generation Z Conference Design Preferences

Vanja Pavluković
Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad
Carina Dantas
SHINE2Europe
Lazar Pavić
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Maribor, Slovenia, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Milica Rančić Demir
University of Maribor, Faculty of Tourism, Slovenia

Published 28.03.2026

Keywords

  • Generation Z,
  • Business events,
  • Conference design,
  • Sustainability,
  • Technology-enhanced conferences

How to Cite

From Interaction to Sustainability: An Exploratory Study of Serbian Generation Z Conference Design Preferences. (2026). International Journal of Emerging Trends in Management, 2(1), 01-08. https://doi.org/10.65984/ETM2.1.1

Abstract

This study examines conference design preferences among Generation Z participants, with a particular focus on technology-related and sustainability-oriented attributes. As this generational cohort becomes increasingly influential within the business events sector, understanding their expectations is essential for the future development of conferences. Survey data were collected from 257 Generation Z respondents in Serbia, all of whom had prior conference attendance experience. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to identify the underlying dimensions of conference design preferences. The results reveal a four-factor structure comprising experiential and personalized learning, sustainability and social responsibility orientation, technology-enhanced conference interaction, and virtual participation and networking. The findings indicate that Generation Z strongly values interactive digital technologies that enable real-time engagement with speakers and flexible participation formats. In addition, sustainability-related practices, including environmentally responsible and socially conscious initiatives, emerge as a distinct and influential dimension shaping conference attractiveness. The study concludes that technology integration and sustainability are central determinants of conference appeal for Generation Z rather than peripheral features. These findings offer practical recommendations for conference organizers and destination stakeholders seeking to design future-oriented conferences that align with the expectations of this emerging and increasingly important market segment.

 

Article history: Received (February 5, 2026); Revised (February 15, 2026); Accepted (February 22, 2026); Published online (February 27, 2026)

References

  1. Bhalla, R., Tiwari, P., & Chowdhary, N. (2021). Digital natives leading the world: Paragons and values of Generation Z. In N. Stylos, R. Rahimi, B. Okumus, & S. Williams (Eds.), Generation Z marketing and management in tourism and hospitality. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70695-1_1
  2. Chen, J., Jung, S., & Cai, L. A. (2025). A critical review of technology-facilitated event engagement: Current landscape and pathway forward. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(13), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2025-0236
  3. Damanik, J., Priyambodo, T. K., Wibowo, M. E., Pitanatri, P. D. S., & Wachyuni, S. S. (2023). Travel behaviour differences among Indonesian youth in Generations Y and Z: Pre-, during and post-travel. Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality, 18(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/CBTH-07-2021-0184
  4. Davidson, R. (2019). Business events (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  5. Del Chiappa, G. (2012). How do meeting organizers choose convention sites based on different types of meetings? An empirical analysis of the Italian meetings industry. Event Management, 16(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599512X13343565268410
  6. Djafarova, E., & Foots, S. (2022). Exploring ethical consumption of Generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consumers, 23(3), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2021-1405
  7. Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company. https://www.drthomaswu.com/uicmpaccsmac/Gen%20Z.pdf
  8. Getz, D., & Page, S. J. (2016). Progress and prospects for event tourism research. Tourism Management, 52, 593–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.03.007
  9. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  10. Lee, J., Kim, S. H., & Kang, B. (2019). US DMOs and meeting planners: Do they really engage with each other? Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 20, 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2019.1674757
  11. Mair, J., & Whitford, M. (2013). An exploration of events research: Event topics, themes and emerging trends. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 4(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/17582951311307485
  12. Mair, J., Lockstone-Binney, L., & Whitelaw, P. A. (2018). The motives and barriers of association conference attendance: Evidence from an Australasian tourism and hospitality academic conference. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 34, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.11.004
  13. Nikolić, T. M., Paunović, I., Milovanović, M., Lozović, N., & Đurović, M. (2022). Examining Generation Z’s attitudes, behavior and awareness regarding eco-products: A Bayesian approach to confirmatory factor analysis. Sustainability, 14(5), 2727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052727
  14. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual (4th ed.). Open University Press.
  15. Pavluković, V., Carmer, A. B., Vujičić, M. D., Cimbaljević, M., & Stankov, U. (2023). Unveiling the motivational factors behind Generation Z’s conference attendance for sustaining future participation. Sustainability, 15(18), 13989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813989
  16. Pavluković, V., Davidson, R., Chaperon, S., & Vujičić, M. (2022). China’s Generation Z and conference attendance. Event Management, 26(4), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599521X16288665119594
  17. Santos, J. A. C., Fernández-Gámez, M. A., Puig-Cabrera, M., & Santos, M. C. (2024). Sustainability in business events: How hybrid formats shape attendee decision-making. Journal of Tourism and Services, 15(29), 320–348. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v15i29.1006
  18. Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom. Information Systems Education Journal, 16(3), 45–54. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179303.pdf
  19. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Tao, Y., Steckel, D., Klemeš, J. J., & You, F. (2021). Trend towards virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy. Nature Communications, 12(1), 7324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27251-2
  21. Vujičić, M. D., Kennell, J., Lesjak, M., & Mujkić, D. (2025). Transformative shifts in management and marketing in the AI era: Launching the inaugural issue of the International Journal of Emerging Trends in Management. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Management, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.65984/ETM1.1.1
  22. Williams, K., & Page, R. A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3(3), 1–17. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/10575.pdf
  23. Wood, S. (2013). Generation Z as consumers: Trends and innovation. NC State University. https://archive.iei.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/GenZConsumers.pdf